There seem to be several camps on this:
My preference is a combination of 2, 3 and 4. When I’ve had dates who subscribe to #1 and nitpick about what I consider minor infractions, the cumulative effect is I feel picked on.
This is something that I wouldn’t have thought to be a deal-breaker. But it has been. More than once.
It’s not just what someone nitpicks about. It’s the frequency. If he brings to my attention every detail he doesn’t like, it gets trying. You need to pick your battles and only point out behaviors you find obnoxious. So if it bothers you when he wipes his silverware clean in an upscale restaurant, notice his anal retentiveness, but don’t comment. Unless he starts doing it for the couple at the next table.
Someone’s tone can make all the difference. I can take constructive feedback, but not easily if someone has an irritated tone or sounds as if I’m an idiot for behaving a certain way. I try to have a patient tone when I tell my date, but I know that when you let an irritant go on too long, it does come through in your “that’s the last straw” voice.
How the feedback is phrased is important, too. Some people like you to blurt out the problem, “you have bad breath,” vs. a softer, more indirect choice, “let’s have a mint before we continue kissing.” Men tell me the latter drives them crazy, yet many women find the former too blunt and insensitive. Ah, the differences in the genders!
Consider where you tell your date something bothers you. Don’t criticize a man in front of others. If he’s doing something you find offensive, either whisper it to him, or get him to step away from the others. He can become embarrassed — as would you — to hear it in front of friends or colleagues. Also, bringing something up over a nice, romantic dinner can ruin the evening. If it can wait, leave it for later.
I heard a suggestion that for every one piece of corrective feedback, you should have 5 positives. Otherwise, the receiver will feel as I did, continually nagged.
I went out several times with a man who had rigid expectations on when I should bring up anything that bothered me. During our time together, if I did anything he didn’t like, he told me immediately. I, on the other hand, let most things go, giving him grace. However, not saying something about his nitpicking resulted in my feeling continually criticized.
When I explained I had a different philosophy about when to deliver corrective communication, he said, “You have to say something at the time. You can’t say something hours later. It’s wrong. If you don’t say something at the time, you shouldn’t bring it up later.”
His rule was, if you didn’t bring it up instantly upon happening, you abdicated your right to bring it up ever. I reminded him, “We talked about this on the phone. I told you I often brought up things as they happen, but sometimes I don’t realize how I feel about something until a little later.”
“No, you have to bring it up at the time.” Now, I saw that he had no concept that one could experience a feeling, like a mild irritation, but be unable to articulate why until a little later. In his mind, everyone must say what was bothersome at the moment or relinquish the chance to discuss it later. Trying to explain this concept was futile, like trying to explain a beautiful sunset to someone who’s never seen one.
I realized I couldn’t be with someone who had such rigid rules about what was “right” behavior from their partner, especially behavior I couldn’t control. I needed someone who could listen and gently probe if I was upset, not get angry and defensive, just as I would him. While I enjoyed many things about him, I saw that he didn’t have the communication skills I find essential for a long-term romantic partner. Needless to say, we didn’t see each other again.
Which camp(s) are you in?
This is an excerpt from Dating Goddess’ book, First-Rate First Dates: Increase the Chance of a Second Date, one of the 15-book Adventures in Delicious Dating After 40 series.
Subscribe today for free to receive our weekly update and never miss an article.